As the Outdoor Industry Ditches ‘Forever Chemicals,’ REI Lags Behind | Tech Zen

Image for article titled As the Outdoor Industry Ditches ‘Forever Chemicals,’ REI Lags Behind

Photograph: Bruce Bennett (Getty Photos)

This story was initially printed by Grist. You possibly can subscribe to its weekly e-newsletter right here.

Final week, REI Co-op shops across the nation closed for Black Friday. It’s an organization custom relationship again to 2015, the place the out of doors retailer asks prospects to “choose outdoors” quite than take part in a post-Thanksgiving procuring spree.

However there’s one factor that REI hasn’t but opted out of: a category of compounds referred to as “endlessly chemical compounds.” By utilizing these chemical compounds in its waterproof out of doors clothes, a coalition of nonprofits and well being specialists says REI is needlessly polluting the surroundings and damaging individuals’s well being.

“It’s ironic that an organization like REI … is promoting merchandise which are contaminating a few of the most stunning and wild locations,” stated Mike Schade, a program director for the nonprofit Poisonous-Free Future. Related corporations comparable to Patagonia have already dedicated to phasing out per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — referred to as PFAS — and Schade’s group is calling on REI to do the identical.

PFAS comprise a class of chemical compounds which have been utilized in shopper merchandise for the reason that mid-Nineteenth century — usually to provide stain- and waterproof properties to merchandise like nonstick cookware, meals packaging, and out of doors clothes. The issue, nevertheless, is that PFAS are linked to most cancers, metabolic issues, diminished fertility, and different well being issues. Plus, they don’t break down as soon as they escape into the surroundings, therefore the nickname “endlessly chemical compounds.” Scientists at the moment are discovering PFAS nearly in all places they give the impression of being — in consuming water, in breastmilk, in individuals’s bloodstreams. Even rainwater is now contaminated with unsafe ranges of PFAS.

PFAS “are likely to get into every little thing” and pose severe dangers to public well being, stated Jimena Díaz Leiva, science director for the nonprofit Heart for Environmental Well being. They’re launched not solely by shearing off of contaminated supplies like clothes, however on the manufacturing stage, the place massive portions could enter the surroundings by wastewater or airborne particles.

REI is hardly the one firm whose merchandise have examined optimistic for PFAS. Poisonous-Free Future organizers say they’re concentrating on REI as a result of it’s a big and well-respected out of doors retailer. REI doesn’t simply produce its personal strains of clothes, but in addition sells gadgets from an enormous array of different manufacturers: The North Face, Patagonia, Arc’teryx, Mammut, and Black Diamond, simply to call a couple of. A few of these manufacturers have already dedicated to phasing out PFAS. Nonetheless, Schade stated REI might nudge them to maneuver quicker by screening merchandise for PFAS, along with phasing the poisonous supplies from its personal product strains.

REI has “a large affect over the insurance policies of the businesses whose merchandise they promote,” Schade stated. “Requiring their suppliers to ban PFAS of their merchandise … can have a ripple impact throughout the out of doors {industry}.”

REI says on its web site that it’s already stopped utilizing two of probably the most well-studied “endlessly” compounds — so-called “long-chain” PFAS referred to as PFOA and PFOS — and changed them with short-chain PFAS “the place viable options don’t but exist.” However researchers warn short-chain PFAS could also be simply as problematic as their long-chain counterparts when it comes to the threats they pose to environmental and human well being..

In response to Grist’s request for remark, REI stated it was “within the strategy of eliminating all remaining PFAS from our personal merchandise,” but it surely didn’t handle questions on a timeline for that transition.

REI hasn’t elaborated publicly on the obstacles it faces because it strikes away from PFAS. However accounts from different retailers describe an identical drawback: It’s been arduous to search out PFAS replacements which are equally efficient when creating sturdy out of doors merchandise.

PFAS labored “actually, rather well,” stated Matt Dwyer, vice chairman of product influence and innovation for the out of doors clothes firm Patagonia, which plans to get rid of PFAS from its merchandise by 2024. For years, his firm and others relied on the now-infamous class of chemical compounds to make rain gear waterproof — both by making use of the chemical compounds externally in a “sturdy, water-repellent” end, identified in industry-speak as “DWR,” or by weaving them into a water-resistant membrane that may be sandwiched between layers of material.

Early alternative candidates didn’t measure up, Dwyer stated, likening them to “an artist’s hammer and chisel” subsequent to the “dynamite” of PFAS. The options additionally resulted in product negative effects that compromised sustainability in different methods: Some early variations of a PFAS-free end brought about clothes to disintegrate, rising considerations over textile waste.

Nonetheless, some manufacturers appear to have discovered adequate options to maneuver ahead. Retailers together with Marmot and Mountain Hardwear have launched profitable strains of PFAS-free gadgets. Officers from Polartec, which makes materials for corporations together with Black Diamond and The North Face, switched to PFAS-free DWR therapies in July 2021 and has famous “no lack of efficiency from a water repellency or sturdiness standpoint.” The out of doors model Jack Wolfskin says they’ve already gone PFAS-free.

Swedish out of doors model Fjällräven, which claims to be PFAS-free apart from its zippers, says the one factor PFAS-free applied sciences appear unable to do is repel oil. However that’s a compromise the corporate says it’s been prepared to make to handle an pressing menace to public well being and the surroundings.

Why do these corporations report such success whereas others haven’t? It’s unclear, since aggressive clothes manufacturers are typically tight-lipped about their PFAS replacements. Lydia Jahl, a science and coverage affiliate for the nonprofit Inexperienced Science Coverage Institute, stated corporations could also be immune to the prices of switching their product strains, or they might be working into provide chain points. (Giant material suppliers is probably not able to ditch PFAS, even when the retailers shopping for their supplies are.)

Some specialists argue the challenges corporations say they face when eliminating PFAS are overblown; in spite of everything, individuals have been making clothes for excessive sports activities since lengthy earlier than PFAS grew to become ubiquitous. Again then, corporations used wax-like finishes to maintain water from soaking by their clothes. The British Air Pressure merely used tightly-woven cotton material.

Along with bringing again a few of these older strategies, at the moment’s retailers have a rising variety of choices to exchange PFAS. Materials from Marmot and Jack Wolfskin are utilizing polyurethane, a type of plastic materials, to assist repel water. Different corporations use brand-name therapies like Empel and Bionic End Eco that market themselves as environmentally pleasant.

“There are options,” Jahl stated. “In the event that they make investments and put extra assets into it, there are actually good supplies chemists … who can determine the replacements for these corporations.”

Schade, in the meantime, is hoping state laws will pressure corporations’ arms. California just lately enacted a legislation to get rid of “deliberately added” PFAS from most attire by 2025, and — as a result of corporations are unlikely to create separate product strains only for California — the legislation is anticipated to set a nationwide {industry} customary. REI says it helps the legislation, which received’t apply to out of doors clothes for “extreme moist situations” till January 1, 2028.

Washington state can be eyeing stricter rules for PFAS; the Evergreen State’s Democratic governor, Jay Inslee, signed a invoice this spring that’s anticipated to end in a faster phaseout of the poisonous substances, though a timeline hasn’t but been specified.

“We’re hopeful that these insurance policies will immediate REI to reformulate their merchandise,” Schade stated — ideally, quicker than the legal guidelines require. “The corporate has proven it could actually each do effectively and do good on the identical time,” he stated, pointing to its commitments on local weather change and different hazardous chemical compounds. “We’d wish to see REI be a pacesetter and do the precise factor to sort out chemical compounds which have polluted the consuming water for thousands and thousands of Individuals.”

As the Outdoor Industry Ditches ‘Forever Chemicals,’ REI Lags Behind